SaturdaysonCNN INTERNATIONAL630, 1030, 1430 GMT730, 1130, 1530 CET
November 8th, 2011
03:25 AM ET
soundoff (8 Responses)

    Good morning, all, 1st, why is Attorney Paul Callan not surprise about the new development concerning the late Icon Jackson, does it mean he knows what he is capable of doing? Let's start from here. Thanks!!

    November 8, 2011 at 4:57 am | Report abuse |
    • Prisam

      People have a tendency to think bad tgihns won't happen to them or that certain laws just shouldn't apply to them. That or they're stupid.Only a stupid person takes their eyes off the road to text someone, know what I mean?Nothing your thinking is more important than your life, or others on the road.

      July 26, 2012 at 7:15 am | Report abuse |
  2. zimbabe

    The doctor stood no chance. It would have been a surprise if he was found not guilty,

    November 8, 2011 at 6:09 am | Report abuse |
  3. claris

    he is guilty – because HE IS guilty!

    November 8, 2011 at 8:02 am | Report abuse |
  4. Catherine

    This is not right. And on top of that he is remanded in prison till the sentencing!!! I hope all the people responsible for this do not sleep like Michael Jackson didn't sleep until the day this man is released. Baby murderers roam the streets of USA and a man that made a mistake goes to jail. This is way over the top.

    November 8, 2011 at 10:39 am | Report abuse |
  5. Umoudi

    A lesson to all you celebrities with addiction and doctors that place money above ethics. You will pay with your life while doctor goes to jail.

    November 10, 2011 at 11:27 am | Report abuse |
  6. Brian

    , I still haven't been able to find published data on the rtselus of this kind of testing with oakmoss or jasmine absolute (for example). My understanding is that these tests are usually conducted with a handful of "volunteers," but that brings up other concerns. Who are these "volunteers"? Are they likely to be like the general population, in terms of their likelihood of developing allergic sensitization? Have they previously volunteered for other repeated insult patch tests? Is it possible that they might more readily develop allergic sensitization, if they've already been repeatedly insulted with other allergens?

    July 24, 2012 at 6:31 pm | Report abuse |